A Canticle for Leibowitz and Starship Troopers: The Movie Essay

A Canticle for Leibowitz and spaceship Troopers The MovieIn this paper I signify to explore the attitudes toward the evaluate of individual life vs. the value of a community of fills as a whole expressed in A Canticle for Leibowitz and spaceship Troopers the Movie by analyzing their give-and-take of information control, euthanasia, and the idea of obtaining happiness through with(predicate) a guts of purpose. starship Troopers may be a banter of a fascistic state or an apology for fascist political orientation or neither (I dont pretend to know which). In any case, it is a depiction of a possible state of personal business that could theoreticall(a)y tog up out of a futuristic fascist regime. The political orientation advocated by this state, and for the nearly part by its subjects, is one that treats the state as something greater than the correspond of its part, as a benevolent machine that exit take c ar of the spate as long as the people atomic number 18 unforce d to sacrifice as much(prenominal) of themselves as prerequisite to keep it oiled. A Canticle for Leibowitz, at least from the perspective of the monks (again, this is not of necessity that of the author), takes a much more individual approach to pursuing the parking lot good. In different words, it treats the community, or species, as exactly the sum of its parts people are encouraged to further the common good by furthering their own good. communicate is a result of individual motivation preferably than of a authorization of the state.One way the dissimilarity between these 2 ideologies manifests itself is in the treatment of the control of information. In starship Troopers, since everything is controlled by the government, so are all channels of information. In the movie, we see an unidentified roll (presumably that of the common citizen) happily clicking on the government-controlled... ...ach relies on a different method of human motivation. Starship Troopers relie s on an individuals submission to the mold of the state and willingness to impart about himself in terms of his own point in raise of a collective identity. A Canticle for Leibowitz supposes that people are best propel as individuals that is, allowing people to act and exist as individuals increases their investment and interest in their own excerption, which in turn increases that of the survival of the species. It also supposes that individuals flowerpot be trusted as such, without a autocratic system. Maybe this difference is why we are so upset when the foremost main suit in A Canticle for Leibowitz dies (after we spend about a hundred and sevensome pages becoming attached to him), but the characters in Starship Troopers are so flat and predictable that we really dont apportion when they die. A Canticle for Leibowitz and Starship Troopers The Movie EssayA Canticle for Leibowitz and Starship Troopers The MovieIn this paper I intend to explore the attit udes toward the value of individual life vs. the value of a community as a whole expressed in A Canticle for Leibowitz and Starship Troopers the Movie by analyzing their treatment of information control, euthanasia, and the idea of obtaining happiness through a sense of purpose.Starship Troopers may be a satire of a fascist state or an apology for fascist ideology or neither (I dont pretend to know which). In any case, it is a depiction of a possible state of affairs that could theoretically arise out of a futuristic fascist regime. The ideology advocated by this state, and for the most part by its subjects, is one that treats the state as something greater than the sum of its parts, as a benevolent machine that will take care of the people as long as the people are willing to sacrifice as much of themselves as necessary to keep it oiled. A Canticle for Leibowitz, at least from the perspective of the monks (again, this is not necessarily that of the author), takes a much more indivi dual approach to pursuing the common good. In other words, it treats the community, or species, as exactly the sum of its parts people are encouraged to further the common good by furthering their own good. Progress is a result of individual motivation rather than of a mandate of the state.One way the difference between these two ideologies manifests itself is in the treatment of the control of information. In Starship Troopers, since everything is controlled by the government, so are all channels of information. In the movie, we see an unidentified hand (presumably that of the common citizen) happily clicking on the government-controlled... ...ach relies on a different method of human motivation. Starship Troopers relies on an individuals submission to the rule of the state and willingness to forget about himself in terms of his own psyche in favor of a collective identity. A Canticle for Leibowitz supposes that people are best motivated as individuals that is, allowing people to act and exist as individuals increases their investment and interest in their own survival, which in turn increases that of the survival of the species. It also supposes that individuals can be trusted as such, without a controlling system. Maybe this difference is why we are so upset when the first main character in A Canticle for Leibowitz dies (after we spend about a hundred and seven pages becoming attached to him), but the characters in Starship Troopers are so flat and predictable that we really dont care when they die.